Aalii Mentoring
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 863313925
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Honolulu, HI, USA
- Phone
- 8088294219
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Education N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $119,645
- Expenses
- $45,308
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CATHERINE CHING (CO-FOUNDER, CO-PRESIDENT)
- GRACE SATURNIA (CO-FOUNDER, CO-PRESIDENT)
- SHIRLEY YIM (VICE PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- CATHERINE CHING (CO-FOUNDER, CO-PRESIDENT)
- GRACE SATURNIA (CO-FOUNDER, CO-PRESIDENT)
- MARJIE GAUGHAN (SECRETARY, DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To cultivate and foster mentoring relationships to young adults from under resourced communities. With the support of in-person, one-to-one mentoring and group cohort meetings, young people can perservere and achieve their post secondary educational, career and personal aspirations.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization recruited and trained 18 volunteer mentors who were each matched with a young adult mentee. Mentors met in-person with their mentees at least once a month to support and encourage their post-secondary educational pursuits in addition to their career and personal aspirations. Mentors and mentees also participated in monthly group cohort meetings that covered personal finance, career expoloration/readiness, interpersonal skills and other topics relevant to young adults.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 22
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 13.5%; rating input score 13
- Program expense ratio: 35.6%; rating input score 36
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 62.1%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 37% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 41.7% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -10.2% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 13.5% of revenue deployed · 35.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 36/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.