Aaacaa Conference of Independent Clubs Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 451741284
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Hudson, OH, USA
- Phone
- 3302431824
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $91,946
- Expenses
- $84,107
- Assets
- $143,037
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- FRED TITANICH (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- RICHARD BRINKMAN (TREASURER)
- FRED TITANICH (PRESIDENT)
- STEVE LINDEMANN (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The nature of the activities to be conducted, or the purposes to be promoted or carried out by the corporation shall be first, to serve as a business league under section 501(c)(6) of the internal revenue code of 1986 and the regulations thereunder, as they now exist or may hereafter be amended (the "code"), composed of aaa/caa clubs ("automobile clubs") that become members of the corporation ("member clubs") and second, to promote the common interests of the member clubs, by implementing and participating in events, meetings, analyses, communications and other activities in furtherance of the corporation's purposes including (but not by way of limitation) the following: (a)to provide a forum for senior level executives of the member clubs to exchange information and share ideas regarding operating issues to help member clubs succeed in their responsibilities to their staffs and to their aaa/caa individual members. (b)to promote the autonomy of automobile clubs within the federation st
What it reported doing in 2025
All expenses directly advance the organization's mission described in detail on schedule o in part iii.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.5%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.7; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.