Aaa Foundation for Traffic Safety

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
520794368
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2026385944
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,690,753
Expenses
$6,308,727
Assets
$34,094,359
Liabilities
$1,648,292

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHEN-YE DAVID YANG PHD (PRESIDENT & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • CHEN-YE DAVID YANG PHD (PRESIDENT & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $428,867 total reported compensation
  • WILLIAM HORREY (TECHNICAL DIRECTOR): $234,256 total reported compensation
  • BRIAN TEFFT (PRINCIPAL RESEARCHER): $198,185 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The aaa foundation for traffic safety's mission is to save lives and reduce injuries through research into the causes of traffic crashes, and education about proven strategies for mitigating risks on the road.

What it reported doing in 2025

Research: in 2025, aaa foundation for traffic safety (the foundation) published 17 new traffic safety reports, initiated 7 new traffic safety research contracts/agreements, began 6 in-house studies, and continued work on 21 traffic safety research projects initiated in previous years.the foundation funded, managed, and/or performed research in 2025, detailed in the following reports (in chronological order by date of publication): pedestrian fatalities on urban arterial roads at night: an in-depth crash analysis and three case studies; development and validation of messaging to deter cannabis-impaired driving; examination of cannabis users' perceptions and self-reported behaviors to inform messaging to deter impaired driving; alternative transportation and life satisfaction among older drivers: aaa longroad study; a randomized field trial of smartphone-based feedback designed to encourage safe driving: comparing focused and self-chosen goals to standard usage-based insurance messaging; roadside assistance vehicle lighting: review of scientific research and state regulations; increasing the use of smartphone-limiting technology to combat distracted driving; effects of training content and approach on drivers' understanding of and performance with advanced driver assistance systems; driving with partial driving automation systems: developing effective training that drivers will use; aggressive driving and road rage; examining traffic safety across communities: a national perspective and case studies in Arizona, Maryland, North Carolina, and Oregon; social and infrastructure factors shaping road safety: a multi-level analysis of crashes in Ohio, Texas, and Washington; slow down, move over laws: investigating factors influencing drivers' behavior and compliance; summary of longroad research on older drivers from the aaa foundation for traffic safety: 2017-2025; the safety impact of road debris: updated prevalences of crashes, injuries, and deaths in the united states, 2018-2023; 2024 traffic safety culture index; and american driving survey: 2024.foundation research findings are used to support national public awareness campaigns, such as national teen driver safety week and drowsy driving prevention week. They are also used to develop educational materials, and support advocacy efforts of aaa and other traffic safety advocacy organizations. Foundation research findings on pedestrian safety have been cited in numerous state and local transportation department plans, outlining needed safety improvements. All these efforts are ultimately designed to influence and affect real world improvements in traffic safety. Foundation research has also supported our numerous partnerships in the transportation and safety communities. The foundation co-sponsored a research project with Virginia tech transportation institute to assess the prevalences of task engagement and drowsiness in drivers when using certain automated systems compared to situations where the same systems are available but not active. This work also examined the role of distraction and drowsiness in crashes and near-crash situations.finally, in 2025, the foundation initiated research projects which include the following goals: examining the range of american's attitudes towards speeding and related countermeasures; investigating the prevalence and impact of various distracted driving behaviors; understanding how individual, interpersonal, social, and contextual factors influence the decision to drive while impaired; creating and implementing a roadside incident reporting system; updating and extending foundation's previous research on wrong-way crashes; providing updated statistics on fatal hit-and-run crashes; examining the nature of driving done by novice driving; measuring the prevalence of public attitudes towards in-vehicle drunk driving technology; assessing the awareness of and attitudes toward slow down, move over laws; assessing the prevalence of secondary task engage

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 94
  • Transparency & Controls: 57
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 85%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $159.67 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.7%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.4; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 21.6%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 85% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $5.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $429K · 27 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.3M reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.