A Work in Progress Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
273571597
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Margate, NJ, USA
Phone
6098231163
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Agricultural Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$431
Expenses
$5,860
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CAROLINE TILL (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • CAROLINE TILL (PRESIDENT)
  • DANIEL GOTTLIEB (VICE PRESIDE)
  • SUSAN SANDLER (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A work in progress foundation is dedicated to the charitable and educational purpose of developing and maintaining urban gardens and educating the public on how to sustain the gardens. We also teach the nutritional benefits of adding fresh, home grown produce to the diets of the members of our community.

What it reported doing in 2021

Build and maintain teaching kitchen and garden at the boys and girls club of atlantic city. Teach cooking and nutrition classes at the club featuring fresh produce grown in the garden. Establish and assist in maintaining an urban garden located at the salvation army, atlantic city, nj. Establish and assist in maintaining a community garden at hamilton memorial umc 605 arctic avenue atlantic city, nj.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1,259.6%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -29.3% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2012 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.