A Table in the Wilderness
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 831151860
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Newalla, OK, USA
- Phone
- 4053092191
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nutrition
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $41,498
- Expenses
- $13,437
- Assets
- $53,810
- Liabilities
- $916
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Laurel Mauldin (CEO / Program Director and Board Member)
People named in this filing
- Kenneth Armstrong (Chairman of the Board)
- Susan Gay (Board Member)
- Laurel Mauldin (CEO / Program Director and Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Educate Oklahomans on healthful living, providing plant-based education on healthful foods to people with limited access, disease reversal programs, healthy grocery store tours, cooking classes, and reaching people with the everlasting Gospel.
What it reported doing in 2025
During the 2025 program year, the organization advanced its mission to promote community health, wellness, and nutrition education through a series of in person and virtual programs serving adults, families, and children. Programs emphasized preventive health, physical activity, nutrition literacy, and hands-on learning. Approximately 181 individuals participated across all program offerings.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 32.4%; rating input score 32
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 67.6%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 26%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -51.1% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -21.4% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 32.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 32/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.