A+ Schools

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300254325
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Pittsburgh, PA, US
Phone
412-256-8536
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Nonmonetary Support N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$928,383
Expenses
$2,628,083
Assets
$762,558
Liabilities
$111,812

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAMES FOGARTY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JAMES FOGARTY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $155,377 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We're on a mission to ensure: Every community is a place where all kids can get to school safely and on time. Every family has what they need so kids come to school ready to learn. Every school is a place where all students and staff feel they belong and are excited to be.

What it reported doing in 2024

4a. City-wide: we work at a city-wide level to convene partners to end chronic absenteeism through the pittsburgh learning collaborative (plc), stand up initiatives that are co-designed with plc members to address key issues, and provide coordinated supports for funding, communications, and data. This work looks at systemic barriers to success and allows us to bring over 70 organizations and individuals together to advocate for change.a. Pittsburgh learning collaborative (plc): the plc is made up of over 125 organizations across multiple sectors (education, out of school time, health, transportation, housing, and development) that convene every other month as a whole to share resources, identify challenges, and find solutions to issues that are impeding getting children to school. A+ schools provides coordinated supports for funding, communications, and data: these supports include strategic relationships with foundations, corporations, and patrons to provide the on-going financial support needed to support equitable learning outcomes; communications campaigns and materials to raise awareness about learning needs and opportunities; data gathering and reporting around learning needs and outcomes including a+ schools' annual report to the community on public school progress in pittsburgh.i. Annual summit: for the past 2 years, the plc has held an annual summit, bringing in keynote speakers and providing workshops on topics ranging from continuous quality improvement to advocacy for out of school time.ii. Learning cohorts: as part of the plc, 3 smaller learning cohorts are convened monthly. These groups are working to help expand our impact on attendance through shared knowledge, resource sharing, and methodologies that work.b. Research and data: our main research project, the annual report to the community on public school progress in pittsburgh, is supplemented throughout the year by blog posts, data stories, and community presentations that help the community understand the root causes of chronic absenteeism to address them.i. Everyday labs: a+ schools partners with everyday labs and pittsburgh public schools to deliver nudge letters and texts to every student at risk of chronic absence at multiple times throughout the school year. At the circle, our schools partner schools, a+ schools works closely with administrators and staff to codesign attendance interventions using everyday pro, a data tool from everyday labs.ii. Report to the community: our annual report provides information on every pittsburgh public school (district and charter) as well as analysis of trends (the executive summary) and stories about what works (rising up). This report is mailed to nearly 15,000 households, magisterial district court judge offices, legislative offices, libraries, and pediatric offices.iii. Best practice research: the a+ schools team creates public presentations that use data from the report to the community as well as research on best practices from around the nation to help community organizations and leaders understand the role they can play in reducing chronic absence.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 81% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 87
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 91.9%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.92 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -183.1%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.9%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $155K · 11 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.