A S Pushkin Memorial Home for Russian People
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 210611603
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Perth Amboy, NJ, USA
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $583,123
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN VIDNANSKI (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JOHN VIDNANSKI (PRESIDENT): $26,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Place aged russians in home care facilities. Attempted to find in-home care as well but due to covid was unable to move forward.
What it reported doing in 2022
Upon termination of 501-c3 funds were donated to the following 501-c3
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 72% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 57
- Accountability: 21
- Sustainability: 3
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 93.9%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.5%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 42.1% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -22.8% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.6% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 1 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $394K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $26K · 1 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $150K reported
- Consistency: 16 of 17 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2014 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.