A Purchased Field
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 933450464
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Amarillo, TX, USA
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
- Affiliation
- Religious (unspecified)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $111,251
- Expenses
- $131,270
- Assets
- $460,587
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- James Bowling (President)
- Brenda Davis (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- James Bowling (President)
- Kaleen Reyna (Treasurer Secretary)
- Brenda Davis (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Corporation is established and operated with the mission of addressing poverty-related issues to prevent human trafficking. This is achieved by identifying partnering with and donating to organizations that share our core values and charitable goals. All activities are carried out with the approval of the Board of Directors and are managed from our principal office in Amarillo Texas. These efforts support our ability to raise funds and implement initiatives aimed at poverty intervention and human trafficking prevention within the Amarillo community.
What it reported doing in 2024
The primary objective APF A Purchased Field has started is fundraising and has located space and has connected with other local nonprofit to help facilitate community outreach to educate parents and support children in poverty situations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 51
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 55%; rating input score 55
- Program expense ratio: 44.5%; rating input score 45
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.51; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -124.8% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 55% of revenue deployed · 44.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $58K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.