A New Leaf Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
731042760
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Owasso, OK, USA
Phone
9184511491
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,881,304
Expenses
$16,421,971
Assets
$33,078,280
Liabilities
$3,955,864

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARY OGLE (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARY OGLE (CEO): $166,608 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide children and adults with development disabilities the life skills and marketable job training through horticultural therapy, vocational placement and residential services to increase their independence and individual choices.

What it reported doing in 2024

Residential services a new leaf, inc. Residential program operates 2 group homes, 43 additional houses for individuals with developmental disabilities living in tulsa metropolital statistical area. In addition, it also offers 24hr/7 day assistance to individuals living in the community independently. All clients engage in programming that develops and encourages their independence and individual choices, such as housekeeping, grocery shopping, and meal preparation. Services (i.e. Assistance with activities of daily living such as hygiene, medication administration, and transportation) are catered to the specific needs of the individuals to ensure that they are successfully integrated into the community. The overall goal is to promote independence among those we serve. A new leaf provided respite care to 112 individuals and their families. Postive behavior support services the coexistence of developmental disabilities and mental health disorders can have serious effects on a person's daily functioning by interfering withvocational and recreational activities, jeopardizing residential placement, and disrupting family and peer relationships. Our behavior support programprovides direct care staff, job coaches, and clients with comorbidities toolsand coping techniques to prevent behavior challenges before they occur.we served 79 in our behavior support program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 77
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.5%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 85.8%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: $28.37 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.4%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.01; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.7% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.6% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 24.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.5% of revenue deployed · 85.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $14.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $167K · 16 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.