A G Gaston Boys and Girls Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
630514348
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Birmingham, AL, USA
Phone
2059233377
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Boys and Girls Clubs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,674,784
Expenses
$2,243,166
Assets
$13,881,360
Liabilities
$9,813,911

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANDRE MCFADDEN (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANDRE MCFADDEN (CEO): $130,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To inspire and enable young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

What it reported doing in 2024

Since 1966, a.g. Gaston boys & girls club (aggbgc) has operated as a birmingham and bessemer safeplace to stay out of trouble, remain in school and succeed in life. The a.g. Gaston boys & girls club's mission is to inspire and enable young people of the birmingham metro area, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens. It is our intent to serve as a bridge between the home and school in an effort to promote youth development and an inner desire to achieve. A.g. Gaston boys & girls club is one of 1,140 independent, affiliated organizations of the boys & girls clubs of america (bgca) that provides safe places for children during the vulnerable after school hours of 3:00 to 7:00 p.m. And eight weeks during the summer from 7:45 a.m. To 5:30 p.m. We offer children an opportunity to be surrounded by a community of nurturing adults who tutor, mentor, and guide children and teens from high-risk environments. Our team provides academic support, supervised recreational activities, and character and leadership development for those who need it most. Our three clubhouses the walter howlett, jr. Clubhouse in western birmingham, our flagshipfacility, southside homes clubhouse, in partnership with the bessemer housing authority, and center for a new generation (cng) program at hayes k-8 school is our club's first school-based partnership with the birmingham city school system and the office of dr. Condoleezza rice are positioned in areas of the birmingham and bessemer communities to reach those that need us most. Our club sites normally serve over 450 youth daily, and 1,400 per year, from throughout birmingham and jefferson county.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 92.5%; rating input score 92
  • Program expense ratio: 73.4%; rating input score 73
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -33.9%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.19; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.71; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.8%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 92.5% of revenue deployed · 73.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $130K · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.