A Double Blessing Daycare Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
472348792
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2021
Forms available
Form 990 2021
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Phone
4245014893
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Child Day Care

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$86,519
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ASHLEE M LYNCH (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • LESLIE JONES (BOARD MEMBER)
  • PATRICK CHRISTOPHER (BOARD MEMBER)
  • TIFFANY YOUNG (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide childcare services to children and to create a safe, nurturing, academic and social environment conducive to achieving the maximum potential in the

What it reported doing in 2021

Child development: a double blessing daycare center (adbdc) is a home daycare facility for children ages 6 weeks to 10 years. Our mission is to create a safe, nurturing, academic and social environment conducive to achieving the maximum potential in the overall development of a young child. One or more of our board members, staff or volunteers will conduct this activity on a daily-basis. Approximately 100% of our total time is dedicated to this activity which will be funded through tuition payment. After school program: one or more of our board members, staff or volunteers will conduct a daibly after school program that provides tutoring for elementary school students before and after their school day. Approximately 20% of our total time is dedicated to this activity. The after school program will be funded through tuition payment.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 26
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 33.6%; rating input score 34
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -16.9% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -15.8% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -68.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 33.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $29K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2015 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.