A Chance to Bloom Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 475084071
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Conroe, TX, USA
- Phone
- 3154806110
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $180,574
- Expenses
- $193,881
- Assets
- $180,574
- Liabilities
- $193,881
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jessica Russell (President)
People named in this filing
- Jessica Russell (President)
- Barbara Roxanne (Director)
- William DeForge (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A Chance to Bloom is a non-profit, all-volunteer group of animal lovers. ACTB has observed a great need in our community to assist, rescue, foster, provide medical care and love for the unwanted, homeless, neglected and abused animals we so often see. Addressing issues that result in broken bonds between people and their pets as well as community services which may help keep a companion animal with the family they love. ACTB has networked with other Rescue Groups and Humane Organizations to transport and place companion animals all over the United States and Canada. We provide screening of all adoptive applicants to assure that the suitable companion is placed with the appropriate family. A Chance to Bloom provides these needed services through our fund-raising events set in place by our dedicated volunteers and through donations from individuals that believe in our mission. Without "u" there is no "us", please continue to share, educate, donate, foster and volunteer!
What it reported doing in 2018
We spend a majority of our funds and time on medical cases, most of our dogs come from neglect and abuse cases. They have suffered some sort of trauma requiring high medical treatment and attention.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.6%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 67.6%; rating input score 68
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.4%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.93; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.07; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.6% of revenue deployed · 67.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $131K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.