A Caring Plus Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
461595343
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Jennings, MO, USA
Phone
3148144943
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Low-Income & Subsidized Rental Housing

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$53,092
Expenses
$369,683
Assets
$290,191
Liabilities
$597,113

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALICE LOGAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ALICE LOGAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $41,141 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A caring plus, inc. Promotes services that enhance the quality of life for seniors and families in underserved communities. Anchored in a safe and secure, family friendly environment, a caring plus, inc. Is a community-based provider steeped in spirituality and staffed with caring professionals dedicated to the comfort of the individuals they serve.

What it reported doing in 2023

The a caring plus, inc. Senior independent living program (silp) is one of four silp's in Missouri, funded in large part by the department of health and senior services, division of senior and disability services. The goal of the silp program is to help seniors age 60 and older age safely within their homes. To accomplish this goal, our silp program offers the following services: lawn care services to its members. Lawns are cut twice per month during grass growing seasons. Minor home repairs that improve the safety and overall efficiency of the silp members' homes.exercise program that focuses on activities that help strengthen members' ability to correctly perform activities of daily living.basic computer classes designed to improve seniors understanding and use of technology. A variety of educational presentations that focus on chronic physical and mental illnesses i.e., high blood pressure, diabetes, congestive heart failure, copd, depression and grief. Note: the naturally recurring retirement community name was changed by the state of Missouri to senior indpependent living program (silp) in appx 2023.additionally, the program offers socialization activities such as movies, bingo, field trips and dinners.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 12
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.7%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 80.4%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: $13.74 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -596.3%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.06; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.1%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.3% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -16.9% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.7% of revenue deployed · 80.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $297K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $41K · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2017 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.