A Call to Serve International

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
954365541
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Columbia, MO, USA
Phone
5738640132
Rating
92
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$24,426
Expenses
$31,948
Assets
$102,745
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Laura Hillman (President)
  • Kathleene James (Vice-President)

People named in this filing

  • Laura Hillman (President)
  • Kathleene James (Vice-President)
  • John Pardalos (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Humanitarian aid and educational programs for the children and elderly of the war torn country of Georgia.

What it reported doing in 2025

We held our diabetes camp in Georgia in June 2025. This was a weeklong camp where children with new onset diabetes are taught how to manage their diabetes and learn that they can have normal active lives. This camp is run by a Georgian endocrinologist and many of the counselors are former campers that share their successes with the younger children. We spent $26,500 to send 24 children plus the Endocrinologist and counselors to the diabetes camp for a week. We spent $261 to wire the money to Georgia to pay for the camp expenses.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 94
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 83.8%; rating input score 84

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -30.8%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.22; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 46.4% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -63.3% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 83.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $27K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.