A Better Miami Dade Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
823964901
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2021
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
4074986034
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Neighborhood, Block Associations

Reported finances

Expenses
$51,559
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • ANDRES OSORIO (DIRECTOR)
  • ROSS MILITELLO (DIRECTOR)
  • ALLISON NORRIS (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The corporation shall be a corporation not-for-profit pursuant to chapter 617 Florida statutes, formed and operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare. The purpose of the corporation shall be to further the common good and general welfare of the people of Florida by promoting civic awareness and public discourse of progressive policy and organizations in miami-dade and south Florida. The corporation may engage only in activities that may be carried out by a corporation exempt from federal income taxes under section 501(c)(4) of the internal revenue code or the corresponding section of any future tax code. No part of the net earnings of the corporation shall inure to the benefit of any member, except that the corporation may pay reasonable compensation for services rendered and may make payments or distributions in furtherance of the purposes set forth herein.

What it reported doing in 2021

A better miami dade inc ("abmd") conducts various programs to educate citizens located in south Florida about the benefits of progressive policy. Abmd sponsors allied organizations and funds activities that may include, but not be limited to, public education through speeches, seminars, research, media distribution, interviews, web site, articles, television, radio and newspaper interviews and other activity for the betterment of society.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 41% for direct work, and 59% for grants.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -28.3% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $52K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 17 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.