San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance
Legal name: Zoological Society of San Diego
Overview
Mission
To save species worldwide by uniting our expertise in wildlife care and conservation science with our dedication to inspiring passion for nature.
What it reported doing in 2024
Sdzwa categorizes all activities into one program: wildlife care and conservation. Sdzwa is an international organization with two front doors: the san diego zoo and the san diego zoo safari park. Sdzwa is committed to saving species worldwide by uniting our expertise in wildlife care and conservation science with our dedication to inspiring passion for nature. Conservation is at the heart of everything sdzwa pursues and it starts with connecting people with wildlife through our zoological parks and education programs, inspiring and educating our guests everyday. Continued on schedule owildlife conservation parks: the san diego zoo and san diego zoo safari park serve as vital hubs for conservation and education, welcoming millions of visitors annually. The zoo cares for over 12,000 animals from 680 species, while the safari park houses more than 3,100 animals from 340 species. Both parks provide immersive experiences and educational programs, fostering a deeper connection to wildlife and conservation.global conservation initiatives: the organization operates eight conservation hubs worldwide, addressing biodiversity loss and promoting sustainable solutions. Key achievements include the reintroduction of endangered species like the mountain yellow-legged frogs and pacific pocket mice, as well as groundbreaking work in cryopreservation through the frozen zoo, which added 199 species bringing the organization to a total of 11,420 species in 2024. The return of giant pandas xin bao and yun chuan in 2024 marked a significant milestone in international conservation collaboration, with panda ridge opening to provide state-of-the-art habitats for this first new giant panda pair to enter the united states in two decades.community engagement and education: nearly 315,000 students visited the zoo and safari park, with over 33,000 participating in guided learning programs. The organization emphasizes community involvement in conservation, supporting local stewardship in regions like palau and africa's savannas. Additionally, innovative technologies, such as thermal drones, are used to monitor species like koalas and tigers, enhancing conservation efforts globally.financial support for conservation: as a large complex nonprofit organization, the san diego zoo wildlife alliance reported $445 million in revenue in 2024, with significant contributions from admissions and gifts. The organization reinvests revenue above expenses into conservation priorities and operational needs, ensuring sustainable support for its extensive global conservation efforts.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 76% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 951648219
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Headquarters
- San Diego, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6192311515
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Zoo, Zoological Society
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.2%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 85%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.73 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 89.5%; rating input score 89; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Pass
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Pass
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 97.8%; rating input score 98; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.6%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.67; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 84.2% of revenue deployed · 85% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $332.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $2.1M · 26 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $16.1M reported
- Consistency: 44 of 47 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 12 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 14 annual filings from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 36 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 26 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Leadership & pay
26 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- PAUL BARIBAULT (PRESIDENT/CEO): $2,056,676 total reported compensation
- SHAWN DIXON (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $870,869 total reported compensation
- DAVID FRANCO (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $800,008 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: FY2024.