Just Safe
Legal name: Alliance for Safety and Justice
Overview
Mission
Through sophisticated advocacy, we pursue smart policies in states across the nation that improve public safety, save taxpayer dollars and strengthen communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Scaling safety is a collaboration between alliance for safety and justice and community-based public safety collective to invest in community-based public safety programs in five cities, document their impact, and promote replication nationwide. Selected by ted's the audacious project as a 2024 cohort grantee, scaling safety is focused on scaling up and supporting the growth of resident-powered programs that provide trauma recovery, crisis assistance, and violence interruption services. These programs are proven to save lives and heal neighborhoods.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 61% for direct work, and 39% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 853209787
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Aug 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Headquarters
- Oakland, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5108364700
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 85
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 81.6%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $39.72 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.4%; rating input score 99; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23.6%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.72; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.7%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 30.8% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.4% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 44.3% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 63% of revenue deployed · 81.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 8 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $37.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $437K · 17 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $7.1M reported
- Consistency: 41 of 42 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 4 annual filings from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 27 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 18 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- CATHERINE LENORE ANDERSON (PRESIDENT & CEO): $437,460 total reported compensation
- ANDREA BROXTON (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $341,552 total reported compensation
- ASWAD THOMAS (VP OF COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT): $278,933 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: FY2024.