757 Select Lacrosse

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
453817756
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2012
Location
Norfolk, VA, USA
Phone
7575759640
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Amateur Sports

Official website

Reported finances

Expenses
$2,170
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JOHN GIBSON (CHAIRMAN)
  • PERSIFOR FRAZER (DIRECTOR)
  • TOM DUQUETTE (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

757 select lacrosse was formed to organize and operate a youth lacrosse league in hampton roads, Virginia. 757 select lacrosse's mission is to promote quality lacrosse, in a competitive environment, led by experienced and qualified coaches and to set the stage for young players to take advanced skills with them in their quest to play at the highest levels of competitive play. The organization's charitable purpose is the promotion, sponsorship and advancement of youth athletics and amateur sports and the education of youths.

What it reported doing in 2020

During the year the organization accomplished its mission through promotion, sponsorship and advancement of youth. 757 select lacrosse ("757 select") continued its charitable purpose by providing youth ages 7 to 17 to learn and play the game of lacrosse. 757 select operated clinics in the spring and fall as well as organizing travel teams that played throughout the year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 27
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 9
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 72.6%; rating input score 73

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -10% per year; rating input score 0; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 72.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2013 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.