710 Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 463177200
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2016, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Sebeka, MN, USA
- Phone
- 2186391242
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $58,388
- Expenses
- $45,494
- Assets
- $13,757
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TANJA DWIRE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TANJA DWIRE (PRESIDENT)
- JEREMIAH DWIRE (VICE PRESIDE)
- SHERRY DWIRE (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The 7:10 foundation has been established to provide relief to the poor, the needy, and the underpriveleged, especially focusing on, but not limited to, those in the la digue region of haiti. This region is where a 7.0 magnitude earthquake hit in 2010; and the area is still recovering from that disaster. Our programs are focused on providing basic and necessary goods such as food, school supplies, and hygiene supplies; and also on helping fund housing, orphanages, and church buildings.
What it reported doing in 2016
Provide basic and necessary goods such as food, school supplies, and hygiene supplies: and also on helping fund housing, orphanages, and church buildings to the poor, the needy, and the underpriveleged, especially focusing on, but not limited to, those in the la dique region of haiti.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.2%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22.1%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -22.3% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 176.4% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.2% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $40K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2015 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.