6757 Olive Holdings
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 813992058
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- University City, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3149972259
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $398,949
- Expenses
- $190,880
- Assets
- $5,345,138
- Liabilities
- $3,196,998
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ELLICIA LANIER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ELLICIA LANIER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $190,883 total reported compensation
- JOSEPH SAUNDERS (CHIEF OF STRATEGY & ADVANCEMENT): $105,000 total reported compensation
- ANDREA BARRAGAN (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $101,459 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
6757 olive holdings serves as the owner of real estate located at 6757 olive boulevard, university city mo, 63130 which it leases in its entirety to urban sprouts for its early childcare mission.
What it reported doing in 2024
Urban sprouts programs are project based learning programs that build social, emotional, physical, and cognitive skills of pre-kindergarten children. At urban sprouts, primary efforts are made to ensure that all children feel personally known and included, and that his or her presence contributes fundamentally to the urban sprouts school community. Children feel important and valued when others listen, seek out their ideas, and allow them to express themselves. When students feel safe, cared for and valued, they take healthy risks required to tackle the tasks that strenghten their cognitive abilities as well as their social and physical abilities. The property that 6757 olive holdings leases to urban sprouts enables urban sprouts to carry out its programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 56
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 68
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 50.3%; rating input score 50
- Program expense ratio: 85%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 52.2%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 28; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.6; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 34.2% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 50.3% of revenue deployed · 85% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $162K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $191K · 9 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.