65 Roses Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
320190099
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Grantham, NH, USA
Phone
6038633888
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Thrift Shops

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$39,626
Expenses
$64,978
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Saralyn Carr (President)

People named in this filing

  • Saralyn Carr (President)
  • Cindy Dyer (Director)
  • Jessica Bitler (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and related orginizations with Donations

What it reported doing in 2015

Donation to Foundation Care LLC through sale of used items at thrift shop. Foundation Care specializes in the care of patients with Cystic Fibrosis

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 3
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 5
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 3.8%; rating input score 4
  • Program expense ratio: 2.3%; rating input score 2

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -64%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 21.3%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -38.8% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -19.2% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -28.6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 3.8% of revenue deployed · 2.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2011 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 4/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.