6 Stones Mission Network
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 264829432
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Euless, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8178687400
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,778,593
- Expenses
- $4,798,071
- Assets
- $9,682,463
- Liabilities
- $1,123,730
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- JENNIFER LENEY (EXECUTIVE DI): $187,505 total reported compensation
- TERESA GRADY (COO): $129,210 total reported compensation
- BOBBY OLSEN (CFO): $119,349 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To meet the needs of the less fortunate in the fort worth dallas metroplex in the following areas: food and clothing, housing, school supplies, and providing community service to lower income families in apartment communities.
What it reported doing in 2025
School based initiatives- this program provides economically disadvantaged students with backpacks and school supplies. This program also provides gifts and christmas dinners to families in need. Night of hope christmas events: 2,409 volunteers, 19 church partners, 3,057 children served, 7,272 volunteer hours in 2025
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.3%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 86.9%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $21.29 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.4%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.02; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.6%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 33.6% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.3% of revenue deployed · 86.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $4.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $188K · 21 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.