Brown University

Overview

Mission

See schedule o

What it reported doing in 2024

Student aid, fellowships and scholarships - brown provides 100 percent of demonstrated need for all aided undergraduate students that matriculate. The university is need-blind for domestic students (us citizens and permanent residents) and "need-aware" for international and transfer (both domestic and international) students. International and transfer students who do not apply for aid as part of their admission application may not received need-based scholarships from the university. Forty-nine percent of the undergraduate student body receives need-based financial aid. The average financial-aid package for the class of 2029 was $64,274. Since the class of 2007, all domestic undergraduate admitted as freshman at brown university were admitted under the university's need-blind admission policy.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 73% for direct work, and 27% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
050258809
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Headquarters
Providence, RI, USA
Phone
4018632716
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Official website

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 99
  • Sustainability: 77
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 97.3%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 90.7%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $14.6 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Pass
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 98.1%; rating input score 98; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.2%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.17; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.2%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 97.3% of revenue deployed · 90.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 51 of 52 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.7B in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $4M · 72 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $96.9M reported
  • Consistency: 46 of 47 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 14 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 annual filings from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 258 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 251 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Leadership & pay

72 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • JANE DIETZE (VP & CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER): $4,043,871 total reported compensation
  • CHRISTINA PAXSON (PRESIDENT/FELLOW): $1,953,784 total reported compensation
  • JOSHUA T KENNEDY (MANAGING DIRECTOR): $1,657,221 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: FY2024.