4Theville
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 853430968
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Saint Louis, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3148275507
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $827,205
- Expenses
- $457,208
- Assets
- $1,749,853
- Liabilities
- $958,239
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AARON WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- AARON WILLIAMS (PRESIDENT): $10,769 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
4theville is a cultural heritage development organization dedicated to championing the legacy of the ville. We build upon the legacy through collaborative growth, activation, and stewardship, ensuring a vibrant future.
What it reported doing in 2025
Special projects - mlk cultural boulevard corridor planning - 4theville hired a planning consulting firm and conducted community engagement to author a revitilization plan for the dr. Martin luther king drive corridor. Activities included professional planning, pop-up activations, fit-out of a storefront information center, and community workshops.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 46.9%; rating input score 47
- Program expense ratio: 84.5%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $77.46 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 44.7%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.83; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.55; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.4%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 81.5% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 56.6% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 82.8% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 46.9% of revenue deployed · 84.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $386K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $11K · 13 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $211K reported
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.