4H Supporters of Brownsboro

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 863556947
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2021–2021
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2021
Location: Brownsboro, TX, USA
Phone: 9032791660
Rating: 63
Verdict: SUPPORTED
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Fund Raising and Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue: $43,914
Expenses: $18,387
Assets: $25,527

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

ZACHARY KENT (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

ZACHARY KENT (PRESIDENT)
JEREMY KIRKPATRICK (VP)
KELLI KRIEG (SEC)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

4h supporters of brownsboro's mission is to provide financial and logistic needs of brownsboro 4h and other children of the brownboro Texas area in their learning of animals and agriculture.

What it reported doing in 2021

All funds and procedes of any fundraising is to be re-invested in children's understanding of animals, agriculture, life skills and the future of the afformentioned items in the community. This includes supporting the brownsboro 4h and it's members with logistic needs for those whithout the means.

Operating model

Revenue model: Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 55
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 63
Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 36.5%; rating input score 36
Program expense ratio: 87.1%; rating input score 87

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: 58.1%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.39; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: Limited
Asset growth: Limited

Details

Where the money goes: 36.5% of revenue deployed · 87.1% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $16K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
Schedules: 2 filed schedules
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 36/100.
Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.