4 Tucson Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300701296
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2023
Official website data refreshed
Jun 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2023
Location
Tucson, AZ, USA
Phone
5207454404
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Religion Related N.E.C.
Affiliation
Religious (unspecified)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$477,046
Expenses
$584,074
Assets
$15,915
Liabilities
$1,868

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JIM WEISERT (PRESIDENT)
  • LAKISHA DEON (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • LAKISHA DEON (CEO): $83,846 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

4tucson is a christian nonprofit committed to fulfilling the command in jeremiah 29:7 to seek the peace and prosperity of our city. We achieve this through prayer, understanding, and thorough research of tucson's systemic issues. Our approach incorporates two collaborative solution-generating models-design thinking and co-creation-allowing us to biblically address these challenges. We strive to establish operational unity among key stakeholders across tucson, including the church, social services, and government agencies, to foster meaningful and lasting change in our community.

What it reported doing in 2023

4tucson tuesdays, connections caf, and 4tucson's women's leadership gatherings collectively brought 72 nonprofit and faith leaders together to get to know one another and learn about 4tucson's current initiatives. Additionally, 4tucson started a faith leader's gathering in the amphi neighborhood that met once a month to build relationship and spark collaboration. This has grown community trust among the faith-based nonprofits and churches in amphi. Finally, our building a lasting legacy event had 42 participants listen to financial planning advice from speakers from the national christian foundation and then hear from 6 local ministries about how they serve their community. This allowed believers of means to connect with ministries that address concerns they care about and to meet their leadership teams. -along with these activities, we also engaged the christian community with programs surrounding biblical civic responsibility. We hosted 369 participants at 10 breakfasts that featured nonprofits and civil servants in different arenas of government such as law enforcement, Arizona's esa program, and policy analysis. Participants heard speakers discuss their areas of expertise and then had the chance to network with other participants and the speakers. We also hosted our annual blessings breakfast to pray a blessing over first responders and elected officials at the start of the year. 137 people attended the blessings breakfast in 2023. Additionally, we hosted several classes regarding the foundation of our government, constitution studies, and the prolife movement. 53 people attended those courses in total. Finally, we hosted two events to pray specifically for our government and nation. In january, we joined pastor pat mcclanahan's one cry tucson event by providing promotional support, and allocating staff and volunteers to join in. 31 people joined us at Arizona's capitol to bless the elected officials for the year and pray for wisdom in decision making. In may, 39 people attended our national day of prayer event to pray for our country as a whole. -the third city issue we are working on is education. In spring of 2023, we gathered 14 local christian authors to participate in tucson's festival of books to promote their educational materials and novels to the tucson community. In addition, we began brainstorming how the christian community might better support education efforts in tucson. In collaboration with other ministries and volunteers, we identified a teacher support group curriculum that will help strengthen teacher's classroom management skills while also giving them a supportive environment to speak about difficulties in their classrooms. Once the curriculum was identified, we worked to raise awareness of the program among churches and ministries in town who would be able to start a support group of their own. -the fourth city issue we are working to address is housing. Out of our 2023 movement day event, we made several meaningful connections with ministries, government agencies, and local businesses who are working to address tucson's housing shortage and homelessness crisis. From those connections, we invited 8 different church, nonprofit, and government leaders to join us on a delegation trip to austin, Texas where we visited the community first village. Participants were able to see how the tiny home village is helping to address homelessness in austin in a creative way. Participants also learned what it might take to build a similar tiny home village in tucson. The trip resulted in lasting collaborations between the faith community and the city of tucson's housing first program, and continued discussion on potential tiny home models that can be built in tucson.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 55
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 13
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 61.2%; rating input score 61
  • Program expense ratio: 50%; rating input score 50
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -22.4%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.03; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.4%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 61.2% of revenue deployed · 50% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $292K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $84K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.