4 Future Generations Entrepreneurship and Leadership Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
834198934
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Brooklyn, NY, USA
Phone
9293045000
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,083
Expenses
$6,050
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KENEHA TRAYNHAMCOOPER (PRESIDENT)
  • DR KIM BEST (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KENEHA TRAYNHAMCOOPER (PRESIDENT)
  • DR KIM BEST (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • KEISHON WARREN (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Building leaders. Shaping futures. Strengthening communities. The 4 future generations entrepreneurship & leadership foundation is a community-based program dedicated to empowering youth and families in underserved neighborhoods. Our mission is to cultivate strong leadership, financial literacy, and professional etiquette that prepares individuals for lifelong success. Through hands-on training, mentorship, and culturally aware programming, we equip participants with the confidence, discipline, and entrepreneurial mindset needed to thrive in school, business, and community life. We focus on building character, fostering responsibility, and strengthening social skillsensuring that every participant gains the tools to lead with integrity and purpose.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 45.4%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 20.2% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: Filed program service accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 5 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.