3 Rivers Community Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 912049302
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Kennewick, WA, USA
- Phone
- 5097355559
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,054,119
- Expenses
- $1,082,659
- Assets
- $13,680,118
- Liabilities
- $2,104,313
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ABBEY CAMERON (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- ABBEY CAMERON (CEO): $99,592 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To create opportunities for perpetual giving in benton and franklin counites to support nonprofits now, and in the future.
What it reported doing in 2025
Each fall 3rcf holds an application-based grant cycle for nonprofits serving benton and franklin counites. Requests are carefully vetted, reviewed, and interviewed to distribute funds to the areas of greatest need in our community. 3rcf funds programs and projects across service areas, supporting housing, mental health, food security, the arts, animal welfare, and more. This giving is supported by donors who create unrestricted or field of interest funds, as well as direct annual giving towards grantmaking.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 84% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 49.9%; rating input score 50
- Program expense ratio: 77.4%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $18.17 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 81%; rating input score 81; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 47.3%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.64; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.2%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 49.9% of revenue deployed · 77.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $838K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $100K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 46 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 45 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 56/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.