22Nd Jdc Bar Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 205497969
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Covington, LA, USA
- Phone
- 9853736554
- Rating
- 39
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $112,993
- Expenses
- $97,728
- Assets
- $42,801
- Liabilities
- $144
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL NICAUD (PRESIDENT)
- AMANDA TROSCLAIR (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- REINA GARDNER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- MICHAEL NICAUD (PRESIDENT)
- AMANDA TROSCLAIR (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- LUKE LANCASTER (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote collegiality and provide educational opportunities for members of the bar in the greater covington area.
What it reported doing in 2025
The 22nd judicial district court bar association supports legal professionals through education, networking, and specialized resources. Members benefit from three specialty sections that offer targeted cle programs, legal updates, and networking opportunities. The association hosts monthly cles, various half-day and full-day cle events, and networking functions to help members stay informed, maintain high professional standards, and foster meaningful professional connections.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 3
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 5%; rating input score 5
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.5%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 29.4%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 5% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.