2164 INC

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464671557
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2129310129
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,204,684
Expenses
$2,373,817
Assets
$2,011,044
Liabilities
$459,140

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIELLE ORISTIAN YORK (PRESIDENT/ED.)
  • SHARNA GOLDSEKER (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • DANIELLE ORISTIAN YORK (PRESIDENT/ED.): $377,470 total reported compensation
  • OLAJUMOKE SAMEN (SENIOR DIRECTOR): $251,518 total reported compensation
  • SHARNA GOLDSEKER (VICE PRESIDENT): $209,252 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

21/64 inc is a nonprofit practice specializing in next generation and multigenerational engagement in philanthropy and family charitable enterprise.

What it reported doing in 2025

21/64 is a nonprofit practice specializing in next generation and multigenerational engagement in philanthropy and as such has conducted a number of activities in alignment with our mission in 2025. We guide multigenerational families and their advisors to courageously imagine what's possible in how they work, give, serve, and grow together.facilitation21/64 provided education and facilitation services to more than 11 families who are making collective decisions together on topics like money and philanthropy as well as over 30 private non-profit foundations, community foundations, federations, and a handful of family office and financial institutions which are trying to educate their donors and clients about the significance of philanthropic giving, identity, values and in how to work across the multiple generations to respond to urgent needs and systemic long-term issues. In these facilitations, we offered frameworks exercises to help organizations, their boards and staff to identify the values inherent in each generation that inform their experience of giving, the vision for what they could fund individually and collectively, as well as strategies for communicating effectively with people of different generations who approach giving differently and see the world and its challenges from different vantage points.toolsin 2025, we continued to ship in-hand tools to our clients. Additionally, 286 individuals participated in 21/64 training sessions, where they received instruction on effectively using the 21/64 tools.conveningin 2025, 21/64 continued its long-standing grand street program, bringing together emerging philanthropic leaders in their 20s and 30s for an interactive retreat focused on identity, philanthropy, and family dynamics. Participants engaged in facilitated discussions that helped them clarify their values, strengthen their understanding of their roles in family philanthropy, and build the knowledge, confidence, and relationships needed to navigate complex philanthropic decisions. The program provided a supportive environment for personal reflection, peer learning, and developing practical strategies to create meaningful philanthropic impact.trainingin 2025, 21/64 offered 11 trainings to professionals across the country, building a network of advisors equipped to apply a values-based, multigenerational approach to philanthropy and help families and organizations make thoughtful decisions about the stewardship of their resources. Participants included professionals from private foundations, community foundations, jewish federations administering donor advised funds, commercial gift fund sponsors, wealth management firms, and other philanthropic organizations. Upon completion of the training, participants become 21/64 certified advisors and are invited to ongoing peer learning opportunities, including educational webinars, research updates, advanced training, and a professional network dedicated to continued learning and collaboration.during 2025, 21/64 continued to strengthen its cohort-based learning model, recognizing that meaningful relationships among participants extend learning beyond the classroom. Cohorts were intentionally designed to foster community, peer connection, and continued dialogue around the complex issues facing today's donors and the professionals who serve them. This approach was further advanced through the continued growth of the certified advisors of color (caoc) program. Grounded in our intentions to take responsibility for diversifying the wealth and philanthropic advising sector, the program provides a dedicated cohort experience for professionals of color to deepen learning, build professional networks, and strengthen leadership to guide donors and clients to allocate their resources toward a just and loving world. Throughout 2025, 21/64 also developed and designed a new program focused on the intersection of identity, self and role, and spirit. This program is dedicated for leaders a

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 72% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.3%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 78.3%; rating input score 78
  • Fundraising efficiency: $9.12 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.7%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 64.1%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.3% of revenue deployed · 78.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $377K · 16 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.