2000 Roses Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
752825776
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2020
Location
Dallas, TX, USA
Phone
2149411333
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$66,820
Expenses
$66,341
Assets
$45,221
Liabilities
$29,100

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROBERT HEARD (PRESIDENT)
  • KAMESHA WILLIAMS (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DEBRA NIXON (SECRETARY)
  • ROBERT HEARD (PRESIDENT)
  • SUSAN MACKEY-LOVE (VOLUNTEER COORDINATOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The nbsp; organization nbsp; s nbsp; primary nbsp; exempt nbsp; purpose nbsp; is nbsp; to nbsp; provide nbsp; services nbsp; and nbsp; resources nbsp; to nbsp; women nbsp; coming nbsp; from nbsp; prison nbsp; to nbsp; help nbsp; them nbsp; with nbsp; cognitive nbsp; thinking nbsp; skills nbsp; and nbsp; behavioral nbsp; modification nbsp; ultimately nbsp; resulting nbsp; in nbsp; positive nbsp; lifestyle nbsp; changes nbsp; from nbsp; the

What it reported doing in 2020

- during the year, the 2000 roses foundation operated training and development programs for its clients and others. The objective of these programs was to provide the participants with the knowledge and skills needed to be productive

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

MIXED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 6
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.7%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 79.3%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.7%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.68; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.64; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -21.8% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -18.1% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.1% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.7% of revenue deployed · 79.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $66K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 17 of 18 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2012 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.