1983 Addis Ababa University Medical Graduates Society

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
874601660
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Skokie, IL, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$97
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • TAFFESSEWORK GIRMA (Director)
  • ASERESAHEGN GETACHEW (Director)
  • WONDIMAGEGNEHU ALEMU (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The 1983 Addis Ababa University Medical Graduates Society it a group made up of alumni of AddisAbaba university medical faculty formed with the purpose creating a bond between the group and usethis association to support the motherland Ethiopia. Through the past one year Ethiopia was ravagedwith war and its consequences. Currently there are thousands displaced by war and widespreaddevastations in the major portion of the northern part of the country. Displaced people have lost theirhomes and livelihoods furthermore they have been killed, tortured and raped. These people haveescaped war and have settled in the adjacent regions of the country, but suffer from a dire shortage offood, medical supplies and clothing. Several homes, hospitals, schools and other institutions have beendestroyed. Basic utilities like electricity and water are in short supply due to destruction of power linesand pipes. The Amhara, Afar and Tigray regions are mainly affected. This is a huge task for the Ethiopiang

What it reported doing in 2024

The 1983 Addis Ababa University Medical Graduates Society is a group made up of alumni of AddisAbaba university medical faculty formed with the purpose creating a bond between the group and usethis association to support the motherland Ethiopia. Through the past one year Ethiopia was ravagedwith war and its consequences. Currently there are thousands displaced by war and widespreaddevastations in the major portion of the northern part of the country. Displaced people have lost theirhomes and livelihoods furthermore they have been killed, tortured and raped. These people haveescaped war and have settled in the adjacent regions of the country, but suffer from a dire shortage offood, medical supplies and clothing. Several homes, hospitals, schools and other institutions have beendestroyed. Basic utilities like electricity and water are in short supply due to destruction of power linesand pipes. The Amhara, Afar and Tigray regions are mainly affected. This is a huge task for the Ethiopiangovernment to tackle alone. Aid is getting in from international and national donors. Thus the AAUMGSdecided to contribute to this venture.It is planned to collect money through pledges made by members of the society and throughmembership fees. Funds will also be accepted from any other willing donors. Aid in the form of cash andin kind will be sent to these affected areas. This aid will be distributed to different regions andinstitution based on a needs assessment made prior to mobilizing the funds. Aid will be sent through thesister alumni society in Addis Ababa Ethiopia. This society will work closely with AAUMGS to do a needsassessment distribute aid and confirm the aid is reaching the needy. This will be done through in persondelivery and follow up and regular reporting to the AAUMGS and presenting photographic evidence tosupport the impact made.Any aid given will be after approval by the executive committee and approval of the members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -133% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -60.5% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.