17 6 Network
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 384189987
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Fort Worth, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8175355555
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $232,977
- Expenses
- $253,818
- Assets
- $185,458
- Liabilities
- $12,947
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MATT STURDEVANT (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- RANDAL LANTHRIPE (BOARD MEMBER): $10,750 total reported compensation
- BEVAN UNRAU (BOARD MEMBER): $9,125 total reported compensation
- JOSH DE LA ROSA (VP & SECRETA): $1,500 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The vision of the pastors and churches who are members of the 17:6 network is to see life changing churches multiplying throughout the world.
What it reported doing in 2024
To equip and resource leaders to develop and multiply life changing churches. We will accomplish our mission by: - creating, developing and operating training programs that develop leadership skills in the context of biblical perspective and kingdom values. - recruit, train & deploy the next generation of leaders. - provide training and coaching for leaders currently on the field. - helping leaders to network and encourage each other. - creating and distributing curriculum and other resources for life changing churches to use. Life changing church defined: a life changing church is able to use its organization, activities and events to build biblical perspective and kingdom values in the lives of its people. - biblical perspective is the ability to view life and situations from god's angle shown in the bible.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 63
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.4%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 85.9%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.9%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.73; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.4%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 53.7% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -10.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94.4% of revenue deployed · 85.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $218K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $11K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.