1207 Senior Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
822907065
IRS 990 coverage
2021–2021
Forms available
Form 990 2021
Location
Landover, MD, USA
Phone
4105629693
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Temporary Housing

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,631,567
Expenses
$2,814,577
Assets
$14,372,949
Liabilities
$19,266,527

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROBERT J WILLIAMS SR (PRESIDENT)
  • LARRY BARRIFIELD (VICE PRESIDENT AND ASSISTANT SECRETARY)
  • CARL S WILLIAMS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ROBERT J WILLIAMS SR (PRESIDENT): $60,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See sch oto create and provide decent, safe affordable, state of the art housing options and services to low and moderate income seniors in neighborhoods where said services and housing are not readily available.

What it reported doing in 2021

See sch osaint paul baptist church received a contribution of the interest in 223 units of senior living and affordable housing in capitol heights Maryland. In turn, saint paul baptist church contributed the same interest to 1207 senior inc. The senior living and affordable house complex offers some of the largest apartment units specifically designed for seniors in prince george's county. The apartment complex is designed with the latest in security systems in and around the building. The common areas and apartments are fitted out with all of the usual amenities and some additional features like handrails in the bathrooms and electronic entry systems. As added conveniences to the residents, there are various services available on-site, a community room, a country store, a beauty salon, a library, a computer center, and a health service office.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 96.8%; rating input score 97
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.11; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.34; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $60K · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.