12 9 Ministries

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
874391817
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Simms, TX, USA
Phone
9032917050
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$191,477
Expenses
$173,048
Assets
$70,420

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CASEY MARTIN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • CASEY MARTIN (PRESIDENT)
  • JUSTIN KING (DIRECTOR)
  • SONDRA MARTIN (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization was formed for the purpose of providing education resources, community development, and gospel-centered discipleship to those in need in foreign countries.

What it reported doing in 2024

To fund a non-governmental organization in malawi africa for the purpose of assisting children with orphan care and school fees so that those children can receive an education which would otherwise not be possible. The organization has also assisted in drilling wells (8 in 2023), providing support for the purchase of a bus, and provided 600 bags of food for hunger relief in addition to establishing a feeding program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 79% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.6%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 93.6%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.6%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.41; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.8%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 46.6% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 33.6% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 39.9% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.6% of revenue deployed · 93.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $162K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.