12 & 12 INC

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
731242962
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2021
Forms available
Form 990 2021
Location
Tulsa, OK, USA
Phone
9186644224
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$21,270,040
Expenses
$17,343,097
Assets
$12,032,227
Liabilities
$4,056,740

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRYAN DAY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • BRYAN DAY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $149,604 total reported compensation
  • MELANIE ANDEREGG (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $110,304 total reported compensation
  • JARED SAWYER (DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTING): $106,791 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to restore alcohol and drug-dependent men and women as productive members of their families, work, and communities. The focus of 12&12 remains on the individual needs of each client.

What it reported doing in 2021

12 & 12, inc. Is one of the largest and most comprehensive residential treatment centers in northeastern Oklahoma. We offer a full continuum of care for adult men and women. Our facility offers medically supervised detoxification, residential and dual diagnosis residential treatment, outpatient treatment, transitional living, independent living, and continuing care services.medically supervised detoxification is designed for those who are at risk for medical complications when withdrawing from alcohol and other drugs. It involves a medical monitoring process provided by a certified physician and qualified nurses. Typical length of stay for this level of care is 4 to 7 days.ambulatory detox services provides physician assessment and skilled nursing care on an outpatient basis for consumers who are withdrawing or are intoxicated from alcohol or other drugs and present with no apparent medical or neurological symptoms as a result of their substance abuse.we served 867 individuals in our detox programs in 2021-2022.residential treatment provides intense structure including education, individual and group counseling sessions. Education and counseling may address anger management, grief recovery, self-esteem, assertiveness, coping skills, stress management, interpersonal relations, gender issues, and relapse prevention depending on the needs of the consumer. The typical length of stay for this level of care is 30 days or less.co-occurring disorders residential services focuses on the greater challenges faced by those dealing with depression and other psychiatric disorders in addition to chemical dependencies. A licensed psychiatrist is on staff to provide psychiatric services, supervise medication and assist in treatment. A total of 37 hours of treatment services are provided each week to all consumers. Typical length of stay is 45 to 60 days.we served 1,414 individuals in treatment services in 2021-2022.bryce house is available to those individuals who qualify as a homeless veteran in recovery who are identified as being in need of a structured environment for a longer period of time. This level provides consumers with the opportunity to work on restoring balance among work, family, and leisure while residing in a structured living environment. Consumers are required to obtain employment or attend school as well as continue counseling and life skills training. Typical length of stay is 5 to 6 months with a maximum stay of 2 years. In 2021-2022 we served 53 homeless veterans at bryce house.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 61.4%; rating input score 61
  • Program expense ratio: 75.3%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: $161.69 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.5%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 61.4% of revenue deployed · 75.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $150K · 18 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $847K reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2009 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.