1000 in Action
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 851536666
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Fairfield, MT, USA
- Phone
- 4067813947
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $55,635
- Expenses
- $33,507
- Assets
- $28,145
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNIFER BARNETT (President)
- TASHA JOHNSON (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- JENNIFER BARNETT (President)
- JENNIFER GRUBER (Secretary)
- TASHA JOHNSON (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
1000 in action is an organization of concerned citizens dedicated to protecting children in our area from child abuse in any form. Together, we provide a realistic and efficient way to effect major change in the lives of our youth.our vision 1000 in action is a collaboration: - commitment from at least 1,000 individuals/businesses in our area - contribution of at least $100 each annually - total of at least $100,000 annually - proceeds fund local nonprofits that directly provide programs and services - donations help eliminate the problem of child abuse - large group x small individual donations = huge impact!
What it reported doing in 2024
1000 in action identified local organizations that are doing excellent work in the field of child abuse prevention and provided financial assistance to them. 1000 in action also brought together experts and professionals in the fields of child care, health and human services, and education to discuss child abuse prevention and how to make a bigger difference in our state.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.3%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 39.8%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.84; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 28.4% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 26.9% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 40.2% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $43K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.