0455 Local

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

21 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Arbitration for union members.

Labor union

Revenue model: Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: 23.2%; rating input score 23; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Operating margin: 2%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.14; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 32%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 0 of 21 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
Leadership: top reported pay $203K · 21 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
Consistency: 11 of 12 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 23/100.
Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 9 not reported.
Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.