Western Dredging Association Pacifc Chapter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
331154558
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Media, PA, USA
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$78,070
Expenses
$76,274
Assets
$70,613

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Rebekah Antoine Zimbabe (President)
  • Teal Dreher (Vice President & Treasurer)

People named in this filing

  • Rebekah Antoine Zimbabe (President)
  • Richard Vincent (Ports Representative)
  • Connor Lamb (Program Manager)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

WEDA is a non-profit technical professional organization devoted to the exchange of knowledge in fields related to dredging navigation marine engineering and construction. WEDA promotes the exchange of knowledge in fields related to dredging navigation marine engineering and construction by sponsoring or co-sponsoring national and international technical conferences seminars and symposia including publication and dissemination of the proceedings. The Pacific Chapter of WEDA represents the West Coast of the United States including Alaska Arizona California Colorado Hawaii Idaho Montana Nevada New Mexico Oregon Washington Wyoming and Canada: British Columbia Alberta Saskatchewan Manitoba.

What it reported doing in 2025

Annual Conference - the Paciffic Chapter hosts and annual membershp conference in the Fall of each year to provide networking education and leadership content to WEDA members in the Pacific regiion and or those that have an interest in dredging and marine technology projects in that region.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.3%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.93; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 77.9% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $78K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.