United Way of Johnson & Washington Counties Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 426062055
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Iowa City, IA, USA
- Phone
- 3193387823
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Federated Giving Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,386,554
- Expenses
- $2,293,479
- Assets
- $3,340,229
- Liabilities
- $1,920,324
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNIFER BANTA (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- JENNIFER BANTA (PRESIDENT & CEO): $133,251 total reported compensation
- EMMA BARNUM (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE & OPER): $102,531 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
United way of johnson & Washington counties, inc. (uwjwc) unites in purpose to improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of our community.
What it reported doing in 2025
United way of johnson & Washington counties, inc. (uwjwc) works to identify gaps, set shared goals, and invest in solutions that make a measurable difference in the needs of our community. Uwjwc conducts a comprehensive community needs assessment every three years, working with the community to gather qualitative and quantitative insights to inform a shared community roadmap that unites local stakeholders in driving meaningful, long-term change. Uwjwc serves as a hub for volunteerism and community engagement through our online volunteer portal, connecting community members with opportunities with local nonprofit agencies, as well as through coordinated group volunteer projects, book and supply drives, and our annual day of caring, which connected 100 volunteers from local businesses to complete projects at 15 nonprofit locations around our community.uwjwc leads the community organizations active in disaster (coad) coalition, maintains the emergency volunteer center (evc), and participates in planning efforts with johnson county emergency management and the emergency operations center to coordinate disaster response and emergency preparedness. Uwjwc also maintains a robust disaster relief fund, which provided temporary housing support for 26 individuals displaced by fire in fy26.uwjwc also managed a variety of programs and initiatives in fy26 including summerships (84 camp scholarships awarded), holiday adopt-a-family (94 organizations, groups, and individuals connected with 193 families, including 481 children) the 211 hotline and online resource (1,387 calls answered in our service area in 2025), and the food access network fund for emergency snap relief ($26,668 raised). Additionally, uwjwc provides various levels of fiscal management, volunteer coordination, and program management for collaborative community initiatives such as ready set school, healthy kids Iowa, the board leadership program, and more.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 68% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.3%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 83.2%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.69 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 92.1%; rating input score 92; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.9%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.46; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.57; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.3%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.3% of revenue deployed · 83.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $133K · 19 people listed
- Consistency: 37 of 38 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 33 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 31 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.