Tau Epsilon Phi Fraternity Tau Omega Chapter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
050298871
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Troy, NY, USA
Phone
5185052010
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$92,736
Expenses
$85,376
Assets
$4,136
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JACKSON MCNALLY (CHANCELLOR)
  • BENJAMIN BUTLER (VICE CHANCELLOR)
  • LOGAN WEBB (BURSAR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To teach young men that there is more to be gained out of life by serving others. To provide the forum through fraternity for our ambitions to be heard and practiced. To give to others without selsh thought of gain or personal advancement. To create a better society where men have learned to value others as they value themselves. To have a membership who respect one another and the organization for which they all stand.

What it reported doing in 2025

Conduct rush & recruitment on a continual basis to seek out and locate individuals who best exemplify the ideals of friendship, chivalry and service in order to grow or sustain the chapter membership. This is traditionally conducted during the spring and fall semesters on the chapters campus. This type of programing generally involves meeting new people through various means including in person events and online social media platforms. Additionally, our chapters routinely conduct philanthropic work to raise money for various causes, typically those in the local community that have a particular connection to the chapter. Furthermore, our members donate their personal time to local community service events to further promote our ideal of service. When not performing philanthropic or charitable programing, members often meet regularly for fellowship and meals to share and inculcate the ideals that they enjoin.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.9%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.