Tamassee Hope Village Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 576000973
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Tamassee, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8649441390
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,249,260
- Expenses
- $2,656,400
- Assets
- $24,435,452
- Liabilities
- $145,150
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jonathan Holland (CEO)
- Wendy Brott (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Jonathan Holland (CEO): $105,975 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Tamassee Hope Village is a private non-profit service organization offering multi-faceted educational programs to children and families in the community. We believe that education is the key to success. Our programs and services are built on this belief. We focus on all aspects of learning and growing to help children and students become confident in meeting educational challenges and in growing into responsible adults.
What it reported doing in 2025
At Tamassee, we believe in families, and our recovery program and education programs empower mothers and their children to find lasting freedom and wholeness. Tamassee's recovery program offers a faith-infused, family-centered, therapeutic community with holistic, evidence-based, trauma-informed services. Nestled in the foothills of the Blue Ridge Mountains, Tamassee's campus provides a safe and loving home to families during the 18 to 24 month program. Tamassee supports each family's reintegration into the larger community so moms can maintain long-term recovery, secure housing and employment to support their family, and children can thrive in school and life.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.1%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 77%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.47 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.2%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.2; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -6.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.4% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.1% of revenue deployed · 77% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $106K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 26/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.