Links Inc Southern Metroplex Tx Chapter
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 883766871
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Red Oak, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2144505943
- Rating
- 40
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $64,784
- Expenses
- $76,567
- Assets
- $14,836
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Yasmin Barnes Jones (President)
- Jenine McClaney (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Yasmin Barnes Jones (President)
- Jenine McClaney (Vice President)
- Kecia Webb (Recording Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Links, Incorporated is an international, not-for-profit organization of professional women of African descent dedicated to community service, cultural enrichment, and educational advancement. The Southern Metroplex TX Chapter serves the needs of thirteen underserved communities in the southern sector of Dallas, Tarrant and Ellis counties promoting our international organization's five programming facets Services to Youth, The Arts, National Trends and Services, International Trends and Services and Health and Human Services.
What it reported doing in 2025
The chapter participated in various community service opportunities in conjunction with other Links chapters in the DFW metroplex in support of the NAMI Tarrant County Walk, the Southwest Transplant Alliance, Friendship West Church Scholarship, the North Texas Human Trafficking Awareness and the Black Family Wellness Expo.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 12
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 12.4%; rating input score 12
- Program expense ratio: 10.5%; rating input score 11
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18.2%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 12.4% of revenue deployed · 10.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 6 filed program accomplishments · $8K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 12/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.