Sean Eduardo Sanchez SES Tennis Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 383763761
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Rancho Santa Fe, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7604156399
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Racquet Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $74,678
- Expenses
- $37,550
- Assets
- $92,992
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- Amelia Sanchez (Trustee)
- Eduardo Sanchez (Chairman)
- Carlos Humberto Sanchez (Trustee)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Maintain a safe refuge for Tecate, Mexico youth where they can learn the sport of tennis and develop advantageous life skills under adult supervision and compete in cross-border tennis tournaments, and to support the efforts of the Empty Cradle of San Diego, California, a non-profit organization that helps parents cope with the loss of an infant at birth.
What it reported doing in 2025
Teach tennis to 300 youth ranging in age from 5 to 18 in Tecate, Mexico.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 47.9%; rating input score 48
- Program expense ratio: 95.2%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 49.7%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.48; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 47.9% of revenue deployed · 95.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $36K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 48/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.