Pta Texas Congress Also Known As-kay Franklin Elementary Pta

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462869301
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2015
Location
San Antonio, TX, USA
Phone
2103981700
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$63,926
Expenses
$71,311
Assets
$4,403
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Hal Ley (President)

People named in this filing

  • Araceli Garcia (Treasurer)
  • Hal Ley (President)
  • Maya Thompson (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support and enhance the education, welfare, and school experience of students at Kay Franklin Elementary through educational programs, field trips, classroom resources, family engagement, student enrichment, and support for teachers and volunteers.

What it reported doing in 2025

During the 2025-2026 school year, Kay Franklin Elementary PTA supported students, teachers, staff, families, and volunteers across all grade levels. The PTA provided Colt Store student incentives, attendance incentives, end-of-year student awards, classroom materials requested by teachers, and Amazon classroom givebacks for each teacher through the Boosterthon fundraiser. The PTA also funded schoolwide field trips and bus transportation, a fall family movie night, fifth-grade T-shirts and promotion activities, a welcome-back breakfast, Veterans Day meals, holiday and teacher-appreciation meals, and other student and campus programs. These activities promoted student achievement, attendance, school engagement, teacher support, and family involvement.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 65% for direct work, and 35% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.6%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 74%; rating input score 74

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.6%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 29.4% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.8% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.6% of revenue deployed · 74% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $53K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.