Pta Georgia Congress
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 582653835
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7703624680
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $70,166
- Expenses
- $3,749
- Assets
- $82,608
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Rahel Tesfazgi (Co-President)
- Jennifer Cappelli (Co-President)
- Zadee Nelms (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Rahel Tesfazgi (Co-President)
- Jennifer Cappelli (Co-President)
- Zadee Nelms (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Parkside Elementary School Parent Teacher Association is a unit of the PTA Georgia Congress. It exists to support and advocate for children and youth in schools, communities, and before governmental bodies; to help parents develop skills to raise and protect their children; and to encourage parent and public involvement in schools. The Parkside ES PTA is primarily focused on impacting the children, youth, and teachers at Parkside Elementary School, a unit of the Atlanta Public School System.
What it reported doing in 2025
Supported school-wide support, including a mutual fund for the book fair to allow every student to purchase a new book and supported the installation of new all-accessible playground infrastructure and Panda Pantry Dry Goods Support (Budget Categories Included: Miscellany School Support, School Spirit, School-Wide Support, Penny Wars Proceeds Payout for Specials Class Equipment, Admin-Requested Support (considered a grant), SNAP Response Panda Pantry)
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 89
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.8%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 94.7%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 22.03; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 73.5% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 71.5% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 76.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 7 filed program accomplishments · $54K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.