PLANNED PETHOOD ASSISTANCE INC T/A Planned Pethood Leadville

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311669888
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Leadville, CO, USA
Phone
7192933769
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Reported finances

Revenue
$29,657
Expenses
$15,735
Assets
$89,393
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Mary Christina Floyd (President Secretary)

People named in this filing

  • Mary Christina Floyd (President Secretary)
  • Jane Gowing (Director)
  • Terri Handy (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To prevent cruelty to animals, especially that arising as a result of pet overpopulation; to humanely reduce the pet overpopulation through community education and spay/neuter programs; to provide financial assistance to individuals and other non-profit organizations to enable them to afford medical and spay/neutering procedures for the animals in their care; to assist in the development and enforcement of the laws of the United States, State of Colorado, County of Lake, and City of Leadville, as such laws relate to animal control and prevention of cruelty to animals; and to undertake all other lawful activities in support of these purposes.

What it reported doing in 2025

Planned Pethood Assistance, Inc. provides animal welfare education and financial assistance aimed at eliminating unwanted pet overpopulation, promoting a healthy animal community, and supporting financially disadvantaged Lake County community members in pet care and illness prevention. Planned Pethood Assistance supports capacity at the Leadville Lake County animal shelter and increased its ongoing support through purchase of training materials and medical supplies for disease prevention and treatment of adoptable animals, including sponsoring a clinic for spay/neuter/vaccination of community pets. PPL also procured and installed sanitary disposal facilities with educational signs throughout the community to reduce pet waste in accumulation areas, promoting overall public health for both two- and four-legged residents.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 49.5%; rating input score 49
  • Program expense ratio: 93.2%; rating input score 93

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 46.9%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.68; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.9% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 49.5% of revenue deployed · 93.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.