Pine Richland Youth Wrestling
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 880660436
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2025
- Location
- Wexford, PA, USA
- Phone
- 9176558243
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Centers, Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $125,009
- Expenses
- $106,694
- Assets
- $34,497
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JIM FAWCETT (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JIM FAWCETT (PRESIDENT)
- MARK HIMES (HEAD COACH)
- RACHEL GLASS (EVENTS COORD)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Pine-richland youth wrestling non-profit organization exists for the youth in the pine-richland school district to develop their competitive wrestling skills in a safe, inclusive environment and to promote and facilitate the transition to the middle and high school wrestling programs. The organization competes in the western area wrestling association league (wawa) and seeks guidance from USA wrestling and piaa. The organization strives to be good stewards of the organization's finances and physical assets in order to help reduce the financial burden on members and to bolster accessibility for all youth in the community.
What it reported doing in 2025
Pine richland youth wrestling has provided structured wrestling training and development for over 150 athletes ranging from beginner to advanced levels. Our program focused on skill development, sportsmanship, discipline, and physical fitness. Through partnership with pine richland school district, we offered wrestling clinics and workshops ensuring access to quality coaching for students.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 86% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.3%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.7%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.32; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 40.4% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $107K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.