Northmont Holding Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
844527625
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Tallahassee, FL, USA
Phone
8503297259
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Real Estate Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$55,200
Expenses
$56,414
Assets
$954,629
Liabilities
$543,471

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ERIC EGGERS (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • STEVE POST (DIRECTOR): $118,654 total reported compensation
  • ERIC EGGERS (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR): $99,007 total reported compensation
  • STEVE STEWART (DIRECTOR): $96,266 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A wholly owned and controlled subsidiary of government accountability institute thats sole purpose is to hold the title to propety located at 2900 and 2908 northmont dr. Tallahassee, fl. This building is to be used by government accountability institute to carry out its organizational mission of investigating and exposing crony capitalism, misuse of taxpayer monies, and other governmental corruption or malfeasance through journalistic efforts and with all forms of media.

What it reported doing in 2025

Northmont holding, inc. Will provide a building to assist government accountability institute which is an independent non-profit media and research organization whose investigative journalism exposes cronyism and government corruption in order to educate the public about the often-hidden forces that drive government decisions affecting their daily lives. The result of this work is a more informed citizenry, better equipped for participation in civic life. The work of gai is done in a non-partisan and non-ideological manner. All information produced by gai for public dissemination is subjected to a rigorous fact-checking and editorial process, adhering to the strictest standards of journalistic integrity. Material is disseminated and published on gai's own platforms and also in cooperation with national news outlets. Gai's work has been featured on cnn, npr news, New York times, national review, 60 minutes, abc news, ny post, fox news, politico, Washington times, forbes, wall street journal, and numerous others. Gai research featured in two New York times #1 best selling books.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 47
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 53.6%; rating input score 54
  • Program expense ratio: 52.4%; rating input score 52
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Limited
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.2%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 16.92; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.57; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 53.6% of revenue deployed · 52.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $30K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $119K · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes related organizations
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.