Northeast District Dental Association of Florida Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510141516
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Jacksonville, FL, USA
Phone
9042857711
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$88,112
Expenses
$103,550
Assets
$138,244
Liabilities
$628

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DEBBIE DEVILLE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • DR SAMIRA MAYMAND (PRESIDENT)
  • DR JASON LEWIS (PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • DR SARAH HAGERTY (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • DEBBIE DEVILLE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $53,826 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To advance the dental profession in education, science, and good fellowship and participate in civic health work in the field of dentistry.

What it reported doing in 2025

Hurricane preparedness and disaster relief programs: the nedda assist dentists to prepare disaster plans and serves as a source of information to coordinate and direct relief efforts when disaster strikes. This program focuses on protecting the public by encouraging dentists to properly secure their patient records so they remain accessible in the event of an emergency. The program also assists dentists who are struck by catastrophe to keep providing access to oral health care by coordinating operatory space and dental supplies in the even of a public emergency. Oral health education programs: the nedda assists the fda and the ada to provide public education programs to promote high quality oral health in the community. For example, nedda volunteer dentists helped to develop the mouth wise program. The mouth wise middle school dental-health education curriculum was created to teach students in sixth through eighth grades about the importance of dental-health care. The curriculum contains four modules: nutrition and soda consumption, use of mouthguards, smokeless tobacco and oral piercing. Each module is targeted to different grade levels. Lessons address the sunshine state standard "health literacy" related to increasing students' knowledge about various ways to promote health and prevent disease. The mouth wise program helps students understand the dangers, harmful effects and diseases that can affect their overall health and well-being. Wounded warriors project: nedda volunteer dentists have contributed time and services to the wounded warrior project. The wounded warrior project's mission is to provide unique, direct programs and services to meet the needs of severely injured service members. At least one service member is receiving free, comprehensive dental care for a one-year period. School resource dentists: the nedda focuses on recruiting and coordinating school resource dentists. These dentists work with school superintendents, school boards, school health education coordinators, school principals, school nurses and administration to represent the dental community on oral-health issues related to students in grades k-12. The school resource dentists reflect the profession's continuing commitment to establish good oral health habits and prevention programs at an early age, and in the public education setting. School resource dentists provide information which helps school administrators and nurses to refer students in need of dental care to a dental home, project dentist's care program, or enrollment in the kids care/healthy kids program. Education outreach for local dentists: the nedda makes available, to member and non-member dentists alike, free educational material on community health issues. As one example, nedda worked closely with the jacksonville electric authority, to distribute jea best practices policy for amalgam wastewater bmp (best management practices). This information is available to all dental offices in the nedda area via the nedda website.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 72% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -17.5%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.34; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 52%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $54K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.